Username:    Password:      Remember me       
Great White Games/Pinnacle Entertainment Group Forum Index Great White Games/Pinnacle Entertainment Group
Discussion Forum for PEG/GWG
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

House Rule: Player-to-Player Bennies

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Great White Games/Pinnacle Entertainment Group Forum Index -> SW General Chat & Game Stories
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Stan Shinn
Novice


Joined: 23 Apr 2009
Posts: 57
Location: Dallas

PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 9:32 pm    Post subject: House Rule: Player-to-Player Bennies Reply with quote

I'm not very good at consistently giving bennies since while GM'ing I have so many things I'm juggling. I hate it when players say they were playing up a hindrance and I failed to notice.

I'm considering a house rule where players, in addition to their three bennies, get two addional different colored bennies which can be spent to buy bennies for other players. For example, players would get three red bennies to use as normal, and two green (like money) 'buy bennies for friends' tokens.

Players can then announce when they are buying a bennie for a friend, and if the group agrees, the player pays the GM with a Red bennie, and the GM gives the player receiving the reward a green normal bennie. Alternatively I might use special coins or something.

A player could only receive on bennie for a given Hindrance, heroic act, etc.

In any case, anyone ever done something like this before?

Is two spendable-tokens to give bennies to friends sound about right?

In my mind, as the GM I'd back off giving bennies except in exceptional circumstances.

Thoughts?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Baiyo
Seasoned


Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 149
Location: Los Angeles or there-abouts

PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 9:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This plan would more or less nix the Common Bond edge. It could work out for your group, but it seems like a complicated rule to introduce when the problem is one you might be able to fix more easily.

Usually at the beginning of an adventure, right around the stage where the PC's introduce themselves to one another, I ask them what their Hindrances are and write them down. It's usually enough to help me remember to give them a benny for something Hindrance-related.

There's also the "pulp hero" rule where you give each player a benny at the end of each combat. It's not for every group, but TAG put's that rule in the rules supplements for their Daring Tales adventures.

If you don't like either of those ideas, then try yours out and let us know how it goes.
_________________
My blog: http://ninjasridingdinosaurs.wordpress.com/ - Now with occassional updates!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheLoremaster
Heroic


Joined: 27 Jun 2003
Posts: 1914
Location: Buffalo, NY

PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I know that Sean Fannon does something similar in his games, but each player gets one "extra" bennie that can be given directly to another player to "boost his cool". You might want to start with that, then give more if it seems to work well.
_________________
"Your GM is metagaming ... and wrong!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
robert4818
Heroic


Joined: 25 Jan 2009
Posts: 1045

PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:44 pm    Post subject: Re: House Rule: Player-to-Player Bennies Reply with quote

Eli Shinn wrote:
I'm not very good at consistently giving bennies since while GM'ing I have so many things I'm juggling. I hate it when players say they were playing up a hindrance and I failed to notice.

I'm considering a house rule where players, in addition to their three bennies, get two addional different colored bennies which can be spent to buy bennies for other players. For example, players would get three red bennies to use as normal, and two green (like money) 'buy bennies for friends' tokens.

Players can then announce when they are buying a bennie for a friend, and if the group agrees, the player pays the GM with a Red bennie, and the GM gives the player receiving the reward a green normal bennie. Alternatively I might use special coins or something.

A player could only receive on bennie for a given Hindrance, heroic act, etc.

In any case, anyone ever done something like this before?

Is two spendable-tokens to give bennies to friends sound about right?

In my mind, as the GM I'd back off giving bennies except in exceptional circumstances.

Thoughts?


I went a different route.

I created a system of "Team Bennies" where players donate bennies to the team pool, (this may not be done in combat). At any point in time a player may pull a benny out of the team pool and use it, with the sole rule being that a Team benny must always be spent on behalf of another player. (So bob pulls out a team benny to allow jim to re-roll his failed fighting roll)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sadric
Veteran


Joined: 10 Jul 2003
Posts: 996

PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 1:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I often forget to give bennies. So, at the start of the game(especialy with new players) I ask them to remind me-especially for action of the other players, not for themself.
It works fairly good.
Very Rarely one of the players have rewarded me, the GM, on of his own bennies! Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Yuritau
Novice


Joined: 06 Sep 2010
Posts: 24

PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 3:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd just tell your players that benny nominations are allowed (but no one gets to nominate themselves). I've done that with my group and it works pretty well.

As long as they keep in mind that they are just NOMINATING, it's still the GMs call whether or not to award one!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tavis
Veteran


Joined: 27 Aug 2007
Posts: 983
Location: Macclesfield UK

PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 4:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yuritau wrote:
I'd just tell your players that benny nominations are allowed (but no one gets to nominate themselves). I've done that with my group and it works pretty well.

As long as they keep in mind that they are just NOMINATING, it's still the GMs call whether or not to award one!


Absolutely - this works well at my table. I often forget to hand out bennies - and I am now, perhaps, guilty of relying on the players to make nominations for cool things said/done and the following on Hindrances.

However, the flip side is that if the group don't have enough bennies, they feel it's their own fault for not roleplaying well enough to be nominated, or not nominating things they thought deserved bennies.
_________________
Currently Playing:

SWD: 50 Fathoms (GM)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stan Shinn
Novice


Joined: 23 Apr 2009
Posts: 57
Location: Dallas

PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 12:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have to same I REALLY like the 'nominating' idea and I'm going to try this first instead of my original 'buy Bennies for other players' idea.

Thanks for your feedback everyone!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jordan Peacock
Legendary


Joined: 08 Sep 2007
Posts: 2303
Location: Orlando, Florida

PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 1:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"Nominating" has just sort of evolved naturally in my games. Some player will declare (after someone else did something), "Hey, I think that deserves a Benny!" Sometimes I'll acknowledge it.

Somewhat more often, I'll have the occasional player who will say, "Boy, I was sure being ARROGANT right then," or some other nudge-nudge-wink-wink statement to beg for Bennies. Sometimes I'll oblige if I agree.

If someone's overdoing it, I'll typically declare something like, "Only one Benny per Hindrance per session," because otherwise I run the danger of having someone take the "Extreme Annoyance to Other Players and/or GM" Hindrance (typically known by some other, more innocent-sounding name) and try to play that one to the hilt, all in the name of "role-playing." Wink
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
GranFalloon
Veteran


Joined: 21 Mar 2007
Posts: 647

PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 3:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gentlemen, BEHOLD!

Ok, the thing to behold is a sheet that I've been working on, sort of a GM's Character Sheet. I just finished it up today, and it's got a little section that might help if your head works like mine. [shameless plug] I posted it up on my blog http://carrotstickheroes.blogspot.com/2012/03/cheat-sheets-are-gms-best-friend.html[/shameless plug]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Stan Shinn
Novice


Joined: 23 Apr 2009
Posts: 57
Location: Dallas

PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 7:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

GranFalloon wrote:
Ok, the thing to behold is a sheet that I've been working on, sort of a GM's Character Sheethttp://carrotstickheroes.blogspot.com/2012/03/cheat-sheets-are-gms-best-friend.html[/shameless plug]


Very nice!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ValhallaGH
Legendary


Joined: 25 Apr 2010
Posts: 4474

PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 12:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Handy! I've got to share this with the guys considering running their first Savage adventures.
_________________
"Got a problem? I've got the solution: Rocket Launcher."
"Not against a Servitor."
"... We're all gonna die."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
peregry
Seasoned


Joined: 05 Jan 2012
Posts: 118
Location: Manassas, VA, USA, North America, Terra, Inner Sphere, Milky Way Galaxy

PostPosted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 12:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Our group tends to work with a nomination system that evolved naturally. The one unwritten rule is that you basically cannot nominate yourself, we even have a call out for it... "Give that man a chip!" and often a chorus of agreement. That said, our GMs are pretty skimpy with bennies, only about one or two are given out a session, which means that most folks have to be very careful with them (this has been an indirect buff to Unlucky and Lucky).

Fortunately, we've mostly been playing with a home brew system where bennies are a bit less critical due to 65-75% of combat taking place in an alternate system.
_________________
- Peregry
It is always giant stompy robot time!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Great White Games/Pinnacle Entertainment Group Forum Index -> SW General Chat & Game Stories All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum