| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
SeventhZombie Novice
Joined: 10 Mar 2011 Posts: 67
|
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 12:14 am Post subject: [NE] Too Harsh? *spoilers* (kinda, maybe, sorta) |
|
|
So tonight I was running my group through the 3rd Episode of the NE Plot Point. The group had a fairly good plan for getting the first family out but with limited knowledge on how many enemies lay waiting within the barrack things got a little hairy.
The PC who plugged all his power points into Invent decided to use his nanobots (which is the trapping for his power) to pump up his piloting and computer skills so that he could grab the Manta parked by the barracks and use it's weapons to destroy the M'buna and keep the Fins, Drones and V'sori from escaping with the first family.
A few rounds later he has managed to get the Manta hovering over the barracks and decides to fire a fusion missile at the M'buna while being inside the blast radius. This is after his Manta has taken one well placed grenade blast and had a fusion grenade stuck to the outside hull waiting to go off (my fusion grenades are always magnet). Needless to say the barracks, M'buna and the Manta took massive amounts of damage.
The Inventor sat unconscious in the burning wreckage of the Manta for quite awhile before they pulled him out.
This is where I'm not sure I wasn't too harsh. Technically from all the explosions, crashing ships and what not the PC should have been dead. But I gave the player two options, he had spent all 20 of his points in Invent, so I ruled that his nanobots in a ditch effort to save him used material from the wreckage and saved his life. BUT he would have to "lose" 4 points of Invent because to save him the bots had to rebuild him into a cyborg. So the 4 pts would represent the Construct power (which he would get at a one point discount to keep his point total even) leaving him with 16 pts still in Invent. The second option was to have his current character be dead when they pulled him from the wreckage and to make a new character. He choose the latter.
Was I too harsh in my options? He looked a bit disappointed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Peanuts Novice
Joined: 19 Oct 2011 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 3:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wow, he chose to make a new character? I think what you did is pretty awesome. One of my characters had a similar sort of comeback, though I did get to tweak him and his powers somewhat when I did. Really though I would have been happy to become a cyborg, I don't think you were too harsh. Characters are meant to be difficult to kill in Necessary Evil, but it sounds like that one was self inflicted, and would count as a heroic sacrifice to me (assuming the others and the first family survived anyway).
Last edited by Peanuts on Thu Oct 20, 2011 3:20 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
geijhan Seasoned
Joined: 23 Dec 2009 Posts: 181
|
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 3:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Given that "You don't die unless specifically ruled so" is a (heavily paraphrased) setting rule for NE, yes, you might have been a bit harsh.
Reconstructing him with parts of the wreckage is a cool idea, though. If you have to hand him a disadvantage because of his near-death, you might just give him distinctive appearance and/or -2 charisma. (It's hard to hide who you are when the warning light of the Manta dashboard got embedded in your cheek and intermittently lights up or some such).
Ideally, I'd have the player describe what he looks like after the reconstruction.
And in the end, even "I was in 3 successive explosions and a spacecraft crash but I got better." is within genre.
Good luck finding a middle ground with your player! (the preceding sentence does not contain an ounce of sarcasm.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SeventhZombie Novice
Joined: 10 Mar 2011 Posts: 67
|
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 4:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | . If you have to hand him a disadvantage because of his near-death, you might just give him distinctive appearance and/or -2 charisma. |
I honestly didn't see him having 4 of his 20 power points as that big of a disadvantage at the time. But I've noticed players get pretty touchie about the game/GM tweaking their characters. I was even going to allow him to bypass the distinctive appearance issue by getting him some synthetic skin (kind of like the Superman villain Metallo) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Timon Heroic

Joined: 21 Feb 2011 Posts: 1075 Location: Haarlem in the Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 5:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think you were too harsh, what you proposed sounds like a neat solution.... but it is your solution.
You might have got more acceptance if you had said "fortunately your brilliant nanobots patch you up with the materials at hand after you are blown up, crushed, shredded and incinerated, what effect do you think that has?" but you were probably blind-sided by his negative reaction. I would also not have offered the new character option as NE indeed has 4-colour "recurring roles" (p20).
What is also going on here is that the player was going to blast the baddies with a cool spaceship and look totally rad and ended up on his ass with his eyebrows on fire: that is quite a let-down, so he probably was not very receptive.
I am currently running NE for a group and your use of the V'Sori forces seems a lot more effective than mine - my guys go through the Drones and K'tharen like a fig cocktail though a short nun.
Sticky fusion grenades are a very good idea....hmmmm  _________________ Biting! It's like kissing but there's a winner!
The Doctor's Wife |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SeventhZombie Novice
Joined: 10 Mar 2011 Posts: 67
|
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 6:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
My group is not the most combat heavy group. And I've been rolling really well against them in combat. I've also found that making at least one of the K'tharens a wild card helps the combat be more interesting. Though I think they are starting to learn if I get too descriptive with the K'tharen then they should watch out for him in particular
The PCs are as follows:
-Bruno the Werespider (Thief and webslinger)
-Gnarl Von Tangleroot (vicious tree man/ecoterrorist)
-El Presidente (Minion heavy warlord from Nicaragua)
-Captain Nicaragua (Radiation based Captain America-Esque)
-The Great Milenko (Illusionist)
-Impulse (Kinetic Energy manipulation, absorption and reflection)
-Adam Selene (Nanobot possessed Inventor) *Dead* |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Clint Site Admin

Joined: 13 May 2003 Posts: 16157
|
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 1:35 pm Post subject: Re: [NE] Too Harsh? *spoilers* (kinda, maybe, sorta) |
|
|
| SeventhZombie wrote: | | This is where I'm not sure I wasn't too harsh. Technically from all the explosions, crashing ships and what not the PC should have been dead. |
As others have mentioned, this is likely the main issue. Technically, he would not have been dead...
"Heroes who would otherwise die by the regular Savage Worlds rules are Incapacitated instead. This condition typically lasts for 1d6 days, at which point the hero can return to action."
Unless the players were specifically informed that Setting Rule was not being used (and maybe they were), then not applying it when the situation comes up is going to blindside them, and likely, as described, be disappointing.
Providing the Construct option is an interesting idea, but it might have been better as an alternative to being Incapacitated for 1d6 days as opposed to the only way the character could survive at all.
Personally, I might even have offered it as "The nanites can rebuild you as a cyborg, which means taking Construct. I won't charge you for it now, but the next time you can take the Power Points Edge that's where the 5 points will come from. Otherwise, it's just Incapacitation for 1d6 days, and then healing the wounds after that." _________________ Clint Black
Savage Worlds Core Rules Brand Manager
www.peginc.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SeventhZombie Novice
Joined: 10 Mar 2011 Posts: 67
|
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 2:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've learned with this particular batch of players that death has to be a real possibility no matter the setting. If not the normal planning and strategizing turns into...well for lack of a better phrase, "Get'er!"
I believe I even started this campaign by saying, "These V'sori are they same beings that kicked the crap out of the guys that were normally kicking the crap out of you before the invasion."  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Clint Site Admin

Joined: 13 May 2003 Posts: 16157
|
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SeventhZombie wrote: | I've learned with this particular batch of players that death has to be a real possibility no matter the setting. If not the normal planning and strategizing turns into...well for lack of a better phrase, "Get'er!"
I believe I even started this campaign by saying, "These V'sori are they same beings that kicked the crap out of the guys that were normally kicking the crap out of you before the invasion."  |
Okay, I can understand the sentiment, but inferring a rules change is not the same as stating a rules change. Did you actually say to them, "We will not be using the Recurring Roles Setting Rule."
If not, then it's not really "fair" to presume they understood that specific change in the game mechanics on their ability to take damage from a statement that reflects the ability of the foes to inflict it.
If you did tell them of the specific change, then the player made his choice with foreknowledge of the potential consequences.
But really, if there is any chance at all that the player didn't know or may have been confused, then giving the decision a second look is a good idea.
Ultimately, probably the best thing to do would be to just talk to the player about the situation. The most important tool here is communication. _________________ Clint Black
Savage Worlds Core Rules Brand Manager
www.peginc.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ogbendog Heroic
Joined: 29 Jul 2004 Posts: 1905
|
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 4:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I liike the idea of using the incient to give the Character the optoin of changing his concept a bit. But not requiring it.
You could say that he was rebuit with metal that doesn't work quite right, and it take d6 days for those temporary patches to be cleaned up. And they are gone, unless he chooses to do it with New Power Points |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SlasherEpoch Legendary

Joined: 07 Jul 2003 Posts: 5625 Location: Off stage left
|
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 4:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ogbendog wrote: | I liike the idea of using the incient to give the Character the optoin of changing his concept a bit. But not requiring it.
You could say that he was rebuit with metal that doesn't work quite right, and it take d6 days for those temporary patches to be cleaned up. And they are gone, unless he chooses to do it with New Power Points |
I agree with what's been said. It's appropriate for the genre for him to be rebuilt as a cyborg, but unless he's actually DEAD dead for dramatic reasons then it should be a merely cosmetic trapping rather than something he got shoehorned into.
Player choice is the most important thing in all games. Traditionally "fun" is considered the most important quality, but that all stems from players having choices. _________________ Proud Savagepedia contributor.
Evil Wig Enterprises Minion #15 - "The
Machete" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SeventhZombie Novice
Joined: 10 Mar 2011 Posts: 67
|
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've definitely made it known that death is a possibility.
In fact the now dead Inventor was all too familiar with PC death since he executed a teammate that had been captured by the Fins. He felt it was too high of a risk to save his downed, nullified teammate so he went invisible and "put one in the back of his head". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Evilgaz Seasoned

Joined: 14 Jun 2004 Posts: 226
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 7:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
The most important thing is communication as the Clintinator mentioned above. You need to have an informal chat with your player about.
In the given situation I'd have said in advance "yeah, you can do that, but if you mess it up you're going to die, no holds barred, let the dice fall where they may" or something along those lines. Maybe dressed it up a bit better.
If your player knows there are going to be consequences to their actions, they'll handle it a lot better. You could even open it up to the player to suggest something and see if that fits with your ideas. e.g. "I lose an arm in the crash, but my nanobots go about creating me an Adamantium one!" and then get him to spend his next advance on bionic arm or whatever.
But yeah, chat to your players, make sure they know what the potential outcome is for a certain course of action - heck, this is where a good deal of tension can come from. They know they might die in a blaze of glory, but do it anyway! _________________ http://basstoneslap.tv |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|