| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Crumbs Novice
Joined: 22 Aug 2010 Posts: 67
|
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Watercraft rules are on page 100 but it looks like they removed falling out understandable since other than that they worked just like other vechicles. Haven't found capital ships yet though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kreider204 Heroic
Joined: 19 Jun 2009 Posts: 1712
|
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Crumbs wrote: | | Watercraft rules are on page 100 but it looks like they removed falling out understandable since other than that they worked just like other vechicles. Haven't found capital ships yet though. |
I see damage rules for watercraft on page 100, but that's it. _________________ "It only takes an extra second to be courteous."
- Constable Benton Fraser |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Crumbs Novice
Joined: 22 Aug 2010 Posts: 67
|
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Because that was all that was in EE under the Watercraft section. It even says they are treated like everything else except for the sinking and falling out rules.
If you read the watercraft rules on page 112 of EE you see that the only thing missing in SWD is falling out.
I think the lack of capital ship rules is more to the point of streamlining the vechicle rules since other than the range adjustments and an few differences in the critical hits table they followed all the same rules. I do wish they had kept the critical hits from EE for capital ships though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kreider204 Heroic
Joined: 19 Jun 2009 Posts: 1712
|
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 3:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Crumbs wrote: | Because that was all that was in EE under the Watercraft section. It even says they are treated like everything else except for the sinking and falling out rules.
If you read the watercraft rules on page 112 of EE you see that the only thing missing in SWD is falling out.
I think the lack of capital ship rules is more to the point of streamlining the vechicle rules since other than the range adjustments and an few differences in the critical hits table they followed all the same rules. I do wish they had kept the critical hits from EE for capital ships though. |
Gotcha, thanks. _________________ "It only takes an extra second to be courteous."
- Constable Benton Fraser |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jonah Hex Veteran
Joined: 05 Sep 2003 Posts: 578 Location: Saskatoon, SK
|
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ogbendog wrote: | | heh. no more 6 pp for 3x3d6 bolts |
And, IMO, long overdue.
I was actually very surprised by this one. I've argued for years that the big damage spike from Bolt, especially when opening with it on enemy Wild Cards, was way too much - on these forums, in threads that included designers - and was always dismissed by the vast majority (politely, of course).
Just curious: are blast and Burst untouched. While Bolt needed a tune-down, doing it while making the other two significantly better may be a bit much. I've found in my Deadlands game that these two are as effective as bolt in many ways. The only reason I find Bolt a problem and not the others is the lack of Nova ability on the other two.
Habitual 4d6 on multiple targets. Ouch |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kakaze Seasoned
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 219
|
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, Blast and Burst can now ace so they are a bit better. Blast can be pretty nasty in big battles with lots of little baddies. I'm in a veteran level fantasy game with a big war that's starting up and the mage has been using blast to some pretty incredible effects.
Of course, everyone is pretty incredible at this point. We have a dagger throwing character who has Dead Shot, Marksman, Ambidexterous, and Two-Fisted. He killed a dragon in one hit with a raise/headshot...
Good times. _________________ Proud creator of Savage Swarm, a game about Giant Ants. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jpk Legendary
Joined: 03 Apr 2007 Posts: 2156 Location: Tazewell, East Tennessee, USA
|
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To clarify a little misnomerage that's been going around in a few places discussing the recent changes:
"Acing" refers to rerolling and adding a die if it gets its top number. Pretty much all damage (except for Breaking Things) can and has always been able to Ace.
For most attacks, hitting with a raise provided +d6 Bonus Damage. This did not apply to Area of Effect attacks in the past. Now it does (unless specified otherwise for some particular reason, though I'm not currently aware of any). _________________ Joel Kinstle
Pinnacle Entertainment, www.peginc.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Talison Seasoned
Joined: 11 May 2006 Posts: 251
|
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 9:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So what is the general rule about things that first appeared as setting rules, are now in the SWD book, and are a bit different now? does the main book supersede the setting book?
For example, the Martial Arts Edges appear in Space 1889 but are different than the new ones in the new book. Similarly, Space 1889 gives you half your smarts die in languages. The similar rule in the new book gives you that plus a free native language. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ValhallaGH Legendary
Joined: 25 Apr 2010 Posts: 4450
|
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Talison wrote: | | So what is the general rule about things that first appeared as setting rules, are now in the SWD book, and are a bit different now? does the main book supersede the setting book? |
Ask your GM.
Not too helpful when you are the GM. But the general guideline is that the Core Rules are simply the core - the Setting rules always trump the core, for that setting. _________________ "Got a problem? I've got the solution: Rocket Launcher."
"Not against a Servitor."
"... We're all gonna die." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Talison Seasoned
Joined: 11 May 2006 Posts: 251
|
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Yeah, in this case I am the GM, but I was thinking to have setting rules trump core rules so I guess I'm on the right path. That said, is the martial arts rules really a setting rule or just a rules revision? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Locnar Seasoned

Joined: 23 Feb 2004 Posts: 207 Location: Morton, IL
|
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
So here is a question: how many things in SWD affect Showdown? Or should they even? _________________ Locnar |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
77IM Heroic

Joined: 23 Jun 2009 Posts: 1591 Location: Austin, TX
|
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 9:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
The martial arts stuff is all new to the core. So I'd say that if the setting book includes a lot of martial arts rules that those are probably better thought out for that setting and should be used instead (e.g., Iron Dynasty or Deadlands). But if the setting only includes like one or two edges regarding martial arts then maybe it's not such a big deal and would be easier to just replace them with the new core book edges.
-- 77IM _________________ Stuff I made: Arcane Abilities · Talent Edge · Savage Fading Suns · Savage Wuxia! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Talison Seasoned
Joined: 11 May 2006 Posts: 251
|
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 9:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Well, my point is they are the same Edge names with the same requirements but different effects. But using the new Core versions to replace the 1889 versions seems to invalidate the Pugilist Edge in 1889 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ValhallaGH Legendary
Joined: 25 Apr 2010 Posts: 4450
|
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Locnar wrote: | | So here is a question: how many things in SWD affect Showdown? Or should they even? |
We'll have to see when they put out new Showdown rules. (Assuming they ever do so; they might not. PEG is wily like that.) _________________ "Got a problem? I've got the solution: Rocket Launcher."
"Not against a Servitor."
"... We're all gonna die." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JackMann Veteran
Joined: 29 Dec 2010 Posts: 694 Location: Tucson, AZ
|
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 4:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Talison wrote: | | Well, my point is they are the same Edge names with the same requirements but different effects. But using the new Core versions to replace the 1889 versions seems to invalidate the Pugilist Edge in 1889 |
Setting rules trump core rules. However, it's ultimately up the GM which ones he wants to use. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kreider204 Heroic
Joined: 19 Jun 2009 Posts: 1712
|
Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
No more changes or additions?
Any chance a friendly neighborhood mod might sticky this?
EDIT: Sweet - thanks, mysterious but helpful moderator!  _________________ "It only takes an extra second to be courteous."
- Constable Benton Fraser |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
steamdriven Legendary

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Posts: 2091 Location: U.K
|
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2011 2:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
i like that guts is now a setting rule, great idea
don't like some of edge names but that's not really a problem, just a personal thing
the layout is cleaner, and is good on the eyes, the new art work is fantastic, what's with all the red armoured people? would like to know more!
looking forward to buying a hard copy when it finally gets to the uk (most rpgs seem to get a bit lost and delayed getting to this fair isle, we are not hard to find, honest, just so you know, we're the funny looking island off the coast of france! )
Last edited by steamdriven on Wed Jul 06, 2011 6:15 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Timon Heroic

Joined: 21 Feb 2011 Posts: 1075 Location: Haarlem in the Netherlands
|
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2011 2:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
And we are the flat bit north of France, where Amsterdam is.
Yes, what is the recurring theme with the (in my PDF) pink power armour? It looks like the Necropolis Spring Collection.  _________________ Biting! It's like kissing but there's a winner!
The Doctor's Wife |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DerFinsterling Legendary

Joined: 13 May 2003 Posts: 5670 Location: Vienna, Austria
|
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2011 5:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Really? Only one try at healing per healer? So no more three rolls with a success each to remove 3 wounds, at the cost of 30 minutes (leaving less time for the other wounded in the group)?
Any explanation on this change? _________________ Markus
The Sundered Skies Serial - full of spoilers!
Savagepedia at wikispaces |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lord Inar Heroic

Joined: 30 May 2006 Posts: 1532 Location: Boulder, CO
|
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2011 7:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| DerFinsterling wrote: | Really? Only one try at healing per healer? So no more three rolls with a success each to remove 3 wounds, at the cost of 30 minutes (leaving less time for the other wounded in the group)?
Any explanation on this change? |
Not an official answer, but really it just makes it so that for serious healing you need more than one person with the skill. You can still get fully healed in 30 minutes, just by different people. _________________ Lord Inar
Sherwood and Gaslight
Rocky Mountain Savages
SharkBytes |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|