Username:    Password:      Remember me       
Great White Games/Pinnacle Entertainment Group Forum Index Great White Games/Pinnacle Entertainment Group
Discussion Forum for PEG/GWG
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

SWEX to SWD - changes and additions
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Great White Games/Pinnacle Entertainment Group Forum Index -> SW General Chat & Game Stories
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Crumbs
Novice


Joined: 22 Aug 2010
Posts: 74

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Watercraft rules are on page 100 but it looks like they removed falling out understandable since other than that they worked just like other vechicles. Haven't found capital ships yet though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kreider204
Heroic


Joined: 19 Jun 2009
Posts: 1723

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Crumbs wrote:
Watercraft rules are on page 100 but it looks like they removed falling out understandable since other than that they worked just like other vechicles. Haven't found capital ships yet though.


I see damage rules for watercraft on page 100, but that's it.
_________________
"It only takes an extra second to be courteous."
- Constable Benton Fraser
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Crumbs
Novice


Joined: 22 Aug 2010
Posts: 74

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Because that was all that was in EE under the Watercraft section. It even says they are treated like everything else except for the sinking and falling out rules.

If you read the watercraft rules on page 112 of EE you see that the only thing missing in SWD is falling out.

I think the lack of capital ship rules is more to the point of streamlining the vechicle rules since other than the range adjustments and an few differences in the critical hits table they followed all the same rules. I do wish they had kept the critical hits from EE for capital ships though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kreider204
Heroic


Joined: 19 Jun 2009
Posts: 1723

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 3:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Crumbs wrote:
Because that was all that was in EE under the Watercraft section. It even says they are treated like everything else except for the sinking and falling out rules.

If you read the watercraft rules on page 112 of EE you see that the only thing missing in SWD is falling out.

I think the lack of capital ship rules is more to the point of streamlining the vechicle rules since other than the range adjustments and an few differences in the critical hits table they followed all the same rules. I do wish they had kept the critical hits from EE for capital ships though.


Gotcha, thanks.
_________________
"It only takes an extra second to be courteous."
- Constable Benton Fraser
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jonah Hex
Veteran


Joined: 05 Sep 2003
Posts: 746
Location: Saskatoon, SK

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 5:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ogbendog wrote:
heh. no more 6 pp for 3x3d6 bolts


And, IMO, long overdue.

I was actually very surprised by this one. I've argued for years that the big damage spike from Bolt, especially when opening with it on enemy Wild Cards, was way too much - on these forums, in threads that included designers - and was always dismissed by the vast majority (politely, of course).

Just curious: are blast and Burst untouched. While Bolt needed a tune-down, doing it while making the other two significantly better may be a bit much. I've found in my Deadlands game that these two are as effective as bolt in many ways. The only reason I find Bolt a problem and not the others is the lack of Nova ability on the other two.

Habitual 4d6 on multiple targets. Ouch
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Kakaze
Seasoned


Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 223

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 6:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, Blast and Burst can now ace so they are a bit better. Blast can be pretty nasty in big battles with lots of little baddies. I'm in a veteran level fantasy game with a big war that's starting up and the mage has been using blast to some pretty incredible effects.

Of course, everyone is pretty incredible at this point. We have a dagger throwing character who has Dead Shot, Marksman, Ambidexterous, and Two-Fisted. He killed a dragon in one hit with a raise/headshot...

Good times.
_________________
Proud creator of Savage Swarm, a game about Giant Ants.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jpk
Legendary


Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 2246
Location: Tazewell, East Tennessee, USA

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 6:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

To clarify a little misnomerage that's been going around in a few places discussing the recent changes:

"Acing" refers to rerolling and adding a die if it gets its top number. Pretty much all damage (except for Breaking Things) can and has always been able to Ace.

For most attacks, hitting with a raise provided +d6 Bonus Damage. This did not apply to Area of Effect attacks in the past. Now it does (unless specified otherwise for some particular reason, though I'm not currently aware of any).
_________________
Joel Kinstle
Pinnacle Entertainment, www.peginc.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Talison
Seasoned


Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 258

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 9:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So what is the general rule about things that first appeared as setting rules, are now in the SWD book, and are a bit different now? does the main book supersede the setting book?

For example, the Martial Arts Edges appear in Space 1889 but are different than the new ones in the new book. Similarly, Space 1889 gives you half your smarts die in languages. The similar rule in the new book gives you that plus a free native language.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ValhallaGH
Legendary


Joined: 25 Apr 2010
Posts: 6400

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Talison wrote:
So what is the general rule about things that first appeared as setting rules, are now in the SWD book, and are a bit different now? does the main book supersede the setting book?

Ask your GM. Wink

Not too helpful when you are the GM. But the general guideline is that the Core Rules are simply the core - the Setting rules always trump the core, for that setting.
_________________
"Got a problem? I've got the solution: Rocket Launcher."
"Not against a Servitor."
"... We're all gonna die."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Talison
Seasoned


Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 258

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, in this case I am the GM, but I was thinking to have setting rules trump core rules so I guess I'm on the right path. That said, is the martial arts rules really a setting rule or just a rules revision?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Locnar
Seasoned


Joined: 23 Feb 2004
Posts: 207
Location: Morton, IL

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 9:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So here is a question: how many things in SWD affect Showdown? Or should they even?
_________________
Locnar
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
77IM
Heroic


Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 1591
Location: Austin, TX

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 9:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The martial arts stuff is all new to the core. So I'd say that if the setting book includes a lot of martial arts rules that those are probably better thought out for that setting and should be used instead (e.g., Iron Dynasty or Deadlands). But if the setting only includes like one or two edges regarding martial arts then maybe it's not such a big deal and would be easier to just replace them with the new core book edges.

-- 77IM
_________________
Stuff I made: Arcane Abilities Talent Edge Savage Fading Suns Savage Wuxia!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Talison
Seasoned


Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 258

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 9:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, my point is they are the same Edge names with the same requirements but different effects. But using the new Core versions to replace the 1889 versions seems to invalidate the Pugilist Edge in 1889
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ValhallaGH
Legendary


Joined: 25 Apr 2010
Posts: 6400

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 4:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Locnar wrote:
So here is a question: how many things in SWD affect Showdown? Or should they even?

We'll have to see when they put out new Showdown rules. (Assuming they ever do so; they might not. PEG is wily like that.)
_________________
"Got a problem? I've got the solution: Rocket Launcher."
"Not against a Servitor."
"... We're all gonna die."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JackMann
Veteran


Joined: 29 Dec 2010
Posts: 733
Location: Tucson, AZ

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 4:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Talison wrote:
Well, my point is they are the same Edge names with the same requirements but different effects. But using the new Core versions to replace the 1889 versions seems to invalidate the Pugilist Edge in 1889


Setting rules trump core rules. However, it's ultimately up the GM which ones he wants to use.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kreider204
Heroic


Joined: 19 Jun 2009
Posts: 1723

PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

No more changes or additions?

Any chance a friendly neighborhood mod might sticky this?

EDIT: Sweet - thanks, mysterious but helpful moderator! Mr. Green
_________________
"It only takes an extra second to be courteous."
- Constable Benton Fraser
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
steamdriven
Legendary


Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Posts: 2091
Location: U.K

PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2011 2:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i like that guts is now a setting rule, great idea Smile

don't like some of edge names but that's not really a problem, just a personal thing Smile

the layout is cleaner, and is good on the eyes, the new art work is fantastic, what's with all the red armoured people? would like to know more! Smile

looking forward to buying a hard copy when it finally gets to the uk (most rpgs seem to get a bit lost and delayed getting to this fair isle, we are not hard to find, honest, just so you know, we're the funny looking island off the coast of france! Laughing Wink )


Last edited by steamdriven on Wed Jul 06, 2011 6:15 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Timon
Heroic


Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Posts: 1112
Location: Haarlem in the Netherlands

PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2011 2:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

And we are the flat bit north of France, where Amsterdam is.

Yes, what is the recurring theme with the (in my PDF) pink power armour? It looks like the Necropolis Spring Collection. Razz
_________________
Biting! It's like kissing but there's a winner!
The Doctor's Wife
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DerFinsterling
Legendary


Joined: 13 May 2003
Posts: 5677
Location: Vienna, Austria

PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2011 5:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Really? Only one try at healing per healer? So no more three rolls with a success each to remove 3 wounds, at the cost of 30 minutes (leaving less time for the other wounded in the group)?

Any explanation on this change?
_________________
Markus
The Sundered Skies Serial - full of spoilers!
Savagepedia at wikispaces
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Lord Inar
Heroic


Joined: 30 May 2006
Posts: 1776
Location: Boulder, CO

PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2011 7:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

DerFinsterling wrote:
Really? Only one try at healing per healer? So no more three rolls with a success each to remove 3 wounds, at the cost of 30 minutes (leaving less time for the other wounded in the group)?

Any explanation on this change?


Not an official answer, but really it just makes it so that for serious healing you need more than one person with the skill. You can still get fully healed in 30 minutes, just by different people.
_________________
Lord Inar
Rocky Mountain Savages
SharkBytes
Best Internet page ever
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Great White Games/Pinnacle Entertainment Group Forum Index -> SW General Chat & Game Stories All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 4 of 7

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum