Username:    Password:      Remember me       
Great White Games/Pinnacle Entertainment Group Forum Index Great White Games/Pinnacle Entertainment Group
Discussion Forum for PEG/GWG
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Slipstream Rocket combat
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Great White Games/Pinnacle Entertainment Group Forum Index -> SW Home-brew Settings & Conversions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Froggy the Great
Seasoned


Joined: 10 Dec 2004
Posts: 295

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 10:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The biggest problem my group has is that in reducing a rocketship down to being treated as a character, it leaves a few players sitting idle during rocketship combats.

Basically, my group found it to be not as exciting as a chase per the SW rules, constraining, and liked the old way better.
I'm still working on getting detailed feedback to e-mail you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Pfr_Fate
Seasoned


Joined: 28 Oct 2008
Posts: 411

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 12:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Froggy the Great wrote:
The biggest problem my group has is that in reducing a rocketship down to being treated as a character, it leaves a few players sitting idle during rocketship combats..


Absolutely the opposite of what I was going for!
Slipstream presents several crew positions (Pilot, Radiophone Operator, Engineer and Gunner - plus the occasional Salvagers on a Robot Man ship). By standard rules, any characters on board can assume these roles. There are usually mutiple Gunners. Engineers make Emergency Repairs. The Pilot makes the manuevers.
To this, 'Rocket Ranger' rules adds the Radiophone Operator 'manuevers', different options for the Engineer and Pilot to consider, the 'Short' in the system Critical to allow for other players trying to fix things on the fly (Thanks Thasmodius!) and making Cooperative Rolls when allowed. All players make their own die rolls based upon their skills, using the generic 'Crew rating' for Extras. All players can share in the debate over which tactics to try out for the turn.
It also attempts to reduce the shift in focus from characters to ships by simplifying the time required for movement (no inches and turn key).
I may have missed an important factor of the existing rules!
I am looking for to the details....how many players you had and how each stayed involved during the chase rules? Did you give each player (not character) a ship to manage?

Thanks for input - good and bad, it always improves! (And old Froggy has been helping from the start!)

-Mike
_________________
The eternal struggle takes time, Max.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Spence
Seasoned


Joined: 20 Jun 2009
Posts: 154

PostPosted: Sat Dec 12, 2009 4:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK so I had to read it... It looks good.

I had a question. Have you given thought to making the outer ring have eight zones instead of four with the mod being -2 per zone rather than -2 per thin line and -4 per thick? This would allow closer combat at the edges while maintaining a cumulative -4 for greater distances. Just a thought.

And you have sparked an idea for a mod to 'Chase Combat'.

So many ideas...so little time....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pfr_Fate
Seasoned


Joined: 28 Oct 2008
Posts: 411

PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 10:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That seems like a simplification that could work! I'll look into the background math, but by expanding the battle-map, it would eliminate a few rules complexities...

Thanks and be back to you on this!

Mike
_________________
The eternal struggle takes time, Max.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pfr_Fate
Seasoned


Joined: 28 Oct 2008
Posts: 411

PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 10:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The math looks good. I will re-draw the Radiophone and see if it looks OK....
_________________
The eternal struggle takes time, Max.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
plugger
Novice


Joined: 13 Sep 2009
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 6:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Goodaye,

Hey, this is good!

I like the simplicity and ease of use of the radiophone. Also like the fact that it stills allows for some tactical maneouvres.

Cheers,
Plugger
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Spence
Seasoned


Joined: 20 Jun 2009
Posts: 154

PostPosted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 10:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pfr_Fate wrote:
The math looks good. I will re-draw the Radiophone and see if it looks OK....


Looking forward to seeing it...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pfr_Fate
Seasoned


Joined: 28 Oct 2008
Posts: 411

PostPosted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 10:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK!

The Radiophone has been changed, which made the movement and range rules ALOT easier....almost 'ages 5+' simple.

Thanks goes to Spence!!! He keeps those rockets flying!

The new link to the re-simplified rules (complete with basic Radiophone display) is:

http://www.mediafire.com/?wygyzhkehld

-Mike
_________________
The eternal struggle takes time, Max.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bill
Legendary


Joined: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 3155
Location: Overland Park, Kansas

PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 8:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nice Pfr_Fate!

I have not had a chance to look in depth at these yet (the idea of players donating xp for ship "resources" and advancement is a good one!) however I would hesitate on posting the details of the ships and edges from a setting on line. It violates the copywrite protection of the owners and forces them to act like cops. You are allowed to reference the stuff by name with a page reference without harm. Anything you change or add is perfectly OK (the radio-phone is very nice retro look by the way!).
_________________
The More I Learn, The Less I Know
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bill
Legendary


Joined: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 3155
Location: Overland Park, Kansas

PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 8:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

For editing suggestions:

Weapons Table pg4 and 8: change the damage (if identical to what is in the book) to "Per Book" or give the page number of the weapon gear.

Remove page 6. These look to be the same stats as in the book without the speed. Better would be to list the ship name, page location and the speed acording to your rules (20" = base speed of +0, 40" = +1?) or something like that.

Other than that the posting should be fine.
_________________
The More I Learn, The Less I Know
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pfr_Fate
Seasoned


Joined: 28 Oct 2008
Posts: 411

PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bill: I am going to have to think on that.

The weapon damage ratings and ship stats were included for ease of use (one location on one piece of paper). I suppose that is a clear copy of Slipstream, but I felt that I counter-balanced by purposefully not restating a number of Slipstream and SW rules.

There are several instances in RR that do not give complete rules (such as the definition of 'wrecked' (page 2), Cooperative rolls (page 2), Emergency Repair (page 3), Outside the ship Action (page 3), KO/Poison Dust (page 4), some Edges and Hindrances (page 7), and I provided no details on how to make characters to use the skills or on any of the SW stuff like eploding dice, Raises, etc.

With all that, I felt the overall copyright question of "Is it fully playable without Slipstream?" then the answer is "No, it is not...Slipstream is required."

But, to be sure, i should add the SW Fan Licensing stuff from Pinnacle. I was waiting for 'play-testing' to end, but I believe you are right on this.

I'll re-up it soon. I'd like to hear from Clint or PEG on the other stuff (tables and ship stats) if I am wrong on that.

Thanks!
_________________
The eternal struggle takes time, Max.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pfr_Fate
Seasoned


Joined: 28 Oct 2008
Posts: 411

PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 10:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Updated.....

Still kept the ship stats and damages. I'll remove them if PEG so desires...I still might change it to "See Slipstream" anyway....have to think.

Added the 'Savage Fan' logo and other copyright materials.
_________________
The eternal struggle takes time, Max.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
skylion
Veteran


Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Posts: 753
Location: Covington, Ky

PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 7:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I get an error message in trying to get to the angelfire link.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Pfr_Fate
Seasoned


Joined: 28 Oct 2008
Posts: 411

PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 11:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry...try this new one:
http://www.mediafire.com/?nwemm3elznn
_________________
The eternal struggle takes time, Max.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
drake113
Novice


Joined: 21 May 2003
Posts: 21
Location: Chicago, IL

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 1:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

((Oops... Nevermind.))
_________________
In theory, there’s no difference between theory and practice, but in practice, there is.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bill
Legendary


Joined: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 3155
Location: Overland Park, Kansas

PostPosted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Looks very nice! I noticed you were using the - sign as a bullet. When you placed them next to modifiers my first thought was you were reversing the modifiers (- a -4 = +4!). I was wondering if you wanted to change those to true bullets to avoid confusion among the sign challenged (like I was at first)?

You were awfully kind with the swivel gun modifiers versus the nose guns. The swivel guns generally ran 50% of the range of the nose guns and only the really short range weapons increment was 20. Still, I think you captured the purpose and general relationship of the weapons so it should work fine!

Wow. Sounds like I'm being really picky. This is a really nice and flavorful option for rocketship combat and I am impressed at your effort!
_________________
The More I Learn, The Less I Know
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pfr_Fate
Seasoned


Joined: 28 Oct 2008
Posts: 411

PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 6:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for your kind words. Effort is halved when it's fun!

As to the Swivel Guns, remember the Nose Guns get a better 'Accuracy' which accounts for ranges...a '+2' means a lot in Savage Worlds (equal almost to whole Die Type better).

using the '-' as a bullet: Wow! Good call!

Ya' see, folks, that is the essence of editing and play-testing! I had a habit of using a punctuation mark as a 'bullet-point' (because that's how we did it on typewriters!) and it can be much more clear with computers. But a habit is a habit and you need someone else to point it out. I'll look that one over in a few!

Thanks!
_________________
The eternal struggle takes time, Max.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yig
Novice


Joined: 10 Oct 2008
Posts: 20

PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 12:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So can a single character perform more then one tactic for the same skill during his turn? (Pilot "Weaving" and aiming the "Nose gun" or an engineer doing a "Full Burn" and "Damage Control")
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pfr_Fate
Seasoned


Joined: 28 Oct 2008
Posts: 411

PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes.

The key is Multiple Action penalties.

Initially, i thought of having each character keep track of seperate tasks. Then, i had the Generic 'Crew' to keep track of... It seemed simpler to have the whole ship affected by the total number of actions by all characters.

But did that make sense? Well, I figured that, since they are all on the same ship, their actions kind of 'bump' into each other. In your example, Weaving would definately confuse the attempts at damage control, fine-tuning the engines and aiming. But that one is easy. Could the others affect each other without Weaving? Sure! Crew running around, engines sputtering into a full blast, the pilot jink a little here and there to line up his shot? Yep. Multiple Action Penatlies.


So, in your example, the Pilot would make two Pilot rolls, each at -6: one for the Nose Gun and one for the Defense. The Engineer makes two rolls on Repair at -6 each for added toughness and +1 Move. Any or all can fail or suceed individually.

If one (or both) of them had 'One Man Crew' Edge, they could lower the MAP for their rolls. It's a great Edge!

Ooops! Typo! Improved One Man Edge lowers two MAPs not just one!

And a side note: Full Speed and Fight Fire do not have rolls, but do add Multiple Action penalties for their use.
_________________
The eternal struggle takes time, Max.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yig
Novice


Joined: 10 Oct 2008
Posts: 20

PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 6:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I definitely like what you did here. I'm only 2 sessions deep into my Slipstream campaign and they have had a couple rocketship chases but no dogfighting. This is a pretty groovy tactical alternative and gives the players something to do. Good work.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Great White Games/Pinnacle Entertainment Group Forum Index -> SW Home-brew Settings & Conversions All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum