Personally, I feel like players should take the risk if they want to reap the rewards.
But I don't think balance-wise it would be very disruptive, especially since you mention two raises or more. Would you differentiate between the different difficulties of called shots?
Succes: normal damage
Raise: +1D6 damage
2 raises: +1D6 damage OR Called Shot at Arm/Leg (normally -2)
3 raises: +1D6 damage OR Called Shot at Head/Unmentionables (normally -4)
4 raises: +1D6 OR Called Shot at eyeslits or similar difficulty (normally -6)
5 raises: Look, you got lucky enough already, OK?
Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 2:52 am Post subject: Re: Called Shot House Rule
I have been toying with a house rule that would allow exchanging the extra d6 of damage when someone gets two or more raises on an attack roll
for the benefits of a Called Shot .
Has anyone tried anything like this?
War of the Dead has a setting rule that if you get 2 raises, you score a headshot instead of an extra d6 damage.
I don't think it would be unbalanced to make it optional (i.e., let the player choose after they've rolled), and perhaps allow a single raise to replace the d6 damage with a limb-shot. In fact I've suggested something similar before.
@Ornimancer: I think this unblances the system.
You have to risk (penalty to roll) to gain (called shot).
Also, you could get a big damage AND ignoring armor, "swifting" the hit on a uncovered location, and all these just to be lucky with dice. _________________ "Balance is the key, Trapping is the word." - - Lord Lance
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum