| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Wibbs Seasoned
Joined: 02 Jan 2011 Posts: 431 Location: London
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 11:05 am Post subject: Stats for a modern hunting bow and modern crossbow |
|
|
Hey all,
I'm thinking of giving one of my PCs the chance of having either a modern hunting bow or crossbow, but have no idea of where to start in statting them out. Obviously there are the medieval equivalents, but I would imagine the modern versions would be significantly different.
Any help would be greatly appreciated,
Wibbs |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Thasmodious Seasoned

Joined: 01 Aug 2009 Posts: 289
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think they'd be statistically any different. You could assume modern bows have a bit better range and use the english long bow range, maybe give modern arrows an AP of 1. Despite the change in looks and materials, the bow hasn't really changed much over the centuries. The main difference today is that you have to be a bit less skilled overall with a bow than our medieval conterparts, with modern materials, the let off of compound bows, accurate sights, etc. _________________ There's more than seventy earths spinning 'bout the galaxy and the meek have inherited not a one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kreider204 Heroic
Joined: 19 Jun 2009 Posts: 1712
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 1:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Agreed - better range, AP 1, maybe reduce Strength requirements. _________________ "It only takes an extra second to be courteous."
- Constable Benton Fraser |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
farik Seasoned
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 325
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Would just use the bows as statted. The biggest advances in bow technology have more to do with the durability and reduced required maintenance (to keep them accurate); factors that aren't covered in the weapon stats. Now I could see applying AP or other traits because of improvements in ammo.
It's important to remember that ultimately savage world has a pretty grainy resolution so if two things are similar enough they are mechanically identical. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chillburn Seasoned

Joined: 15 Sep 2010 Posts: 151
|
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Since encumbrance can be tight I'd consider reducing weight.
You could also allow bonuses for the sighting (other than ease of use, better sights are probably the biggest advance): basically let them buy a scope/sighting-system that gives them an additional +1 when using the Aim action. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zadmar Heroic

Joined: 10 Nov 2010 Posts: 1418 Location: Munich
|
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 10:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| chillburn wrote: | | You could also allow bonuses for the sighting (other than ease of use, better sights are probably the biggest advance): basically let them buy a scope/sighting-system that gives them an additional +1 when using the Aim action. |
I'd just use the scope from SWD - reduces range penalties by 2. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chillburn Seasoned

Joined: 15 Sep 2010 Posts: 151
|
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 1:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Zadmar wrote: | | I'd just use the scope from SWD - reduces range penalties by 2. |
I knew there were rules somewhere, just couldn't find them. What Zadmar said!
Although... modern bows don't really have "scopes", more a series of sighting points to help with the angle to point the bow to arc it the right distance. So if you want to go for hyper-realistic you could consider dropping the modern bow's bonus to +1 (then there's actually some trade-off and real choice between a more accurate crossbow and a faster compound bow). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vinzent Veteran

Joined: 13 Mar 2009 Posts: 763 Location: Seattle WA
|
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 4:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Speaking as a student of archery -
The English Longbow had a pull of 150lbs. Even with modern materials no one shoots this poundage today. At most you're looking at die-hards that shoot 80lbs.
The advantage to modern compound bows is that the wheels reduce the amount of pounds you hold when aiming. Also you get balancers, peep-sights, scopes, laser-sights, and click releasers which make them more accurate. However the problem with modern bows is they get damned heavy. Try holding 5-10 lbs of bow at arms length. Wood bows rarely clock in at over 1 pound.
As for armor piercing, their were two types of bodkins available. One for piercing chain and one for piercing plate. These would be useless against modern armor. And there is no modern day equivalent (nor could there be against bullet proof armor).
So if you want to keep it simple, use the same range and damage as a long bow but get rid of armor piercing and reduce the strength requirement.
| chillburn wrote: |
Although... modern bows don't really have "scopes", more a series of sighting points to help with the angle to point the bow to arc it the right distance. |
Yes there are, but they are rarely used except by people who have bought every gadget imaginable on their new bows figuring it would make up for their lack of skill. And it doesn't.
BTW we traditional archers refer to compound bows as "bows with training wheels". _________________ My Savage Worlds Blog
Get off the Human reservation. Read The Starrunner by C.B. Jones |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ogbendog Heroic
Joined: 29 Jul 2004 Posts: 1951
|
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
compare the bows as written to guns. Do you want them to be worse or about the same as guns?
go from there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chugosh Veteran

Joined: 08 Mar 2008 Posts: 762 Location: Kelso, Washington, USA
|
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 12:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Vinzent wrote: | | As for armor piercing, their were two types of bodkins available. One for piercing chain and one for piercing plate. These would be useless against modern armor. And there is no modern day equivalent (nor could there be against bullet proof armor). |
I thought I read somewhere that in one of those African wars, they were making bodkin points to defeat kevlar vests. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VonDan Legendary

Joined: 08 Jul 2008 Posts: 3306
|
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 1:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| chugosh wrote: | | Vinzent wrote: | | As for armor piercing, their were two types of bodkins available. One for piercing chain and one for piercing plate. These would be useless against modern armor. And there is no modern day equivalent (nor could there be against bullet proof armor). |
I thought I read somewhere that in one of those African wars, they were making bodkin points to defeat kevlar vests. |
A straight Kevlar or other ballistic cloth vest can be pierced. Incidents involving Kevlar vest demonstrations in both corporate board rooms and yocal dumb asses playing around, people have been stabbed and wounded or died thinking when a knife was thrust into the vest it would not penetrate.
Youtube has video of people shooting Kevlar with bows
Now if you add the metal or ceramic trauma plates nothing but a heavy high speed round can go through THAT REENFORCED AREA
I have repaired a few ballistic vest with trauma plate pockets, made one ballistic vest with trauma plate pockets and rebuilt two leather jackets to have a Kevlar liner and trauma plates
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballistic_vest
Von “I can repair your vest no questions asked” Dan _________________ http://s61.photobucket.com/albums/h51/Vondan/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|