Username:    Password:      Remember me       
Great White Games/Pinnacle Entertainment Group Forum Index Great White Games/Pinnacle Entertainment Group
Discussion Forum for PEG/GWG
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Pros and Cons of Landscape versus Portrait layouts for PDFs
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Great White Games/Pinnacle Entertainment Group Forum Index -> SW General Chat & Game Stories
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Landscape or Portrait for PDFS?
1. Landscape for both versions.
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
1. Landscape for both versions.
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
1. Landscape for both versions.
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
1. Landscape for both versions.
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
2. Portrait (standard) for both versions.
16%
 16%  [ 18 ]
2. Portrait (standard) for both versions.
16%
 16%  [ 18 ]
2. Portrait (standard) for both versions.
16%
 16%  [ 18 ]
2. Portrait (standard) for both versions.
16%
 16%  [ 18 ]
3. Landscape for full-color version. Portrait for printer-friendly.
4%
 4%  [ 5 ]
3. Landscape for full-color version. Portrait for printer-friendly.
4%
 4%  [ 5 ]
3. Landscape for full-color version. Portrait for printer-friendly.
4%
 4%  [ 5 ]
3. Landscape for full-color version. Portrait for printer-friendly.
4%
 4%  [ 5 ]
4. Opposite of above.
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
4. Opposite of above.
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
4. Opposite of above.
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
4. Opposite of above.
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
5. Whatever the publisher thinks is best.
4%
 4%  [ 5 ]
5. Whatever the publisher thinks is best.
4%
 4%  [ 5 ]
5. Whatever the publisher thinks is best.
4%
 4%  [ 5 ]
5. Whatever the publisher thinks is best.
4%
 4%  [ 5 ]
Total Votes : 112

Author Message
razorwise
Legendary


Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Posts: 2959
Location: Hither and Yon

PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 4:03 pm    Post subject: Pros and Cons of Landscape versus Portrait layouts for PDFs Reply with quote

Question for you all.

This discussion came up in a meeting today.

If you're getting your printer friendly version of a product in a portrait layout (8.5" x 11") would you prefer to get your full color spectacular version in portrait as well or landscape (11" x 8.5")?

Not making any promises about anything, just want your thoughts.

Please vote and lemme know your pros and cons, will ya?!

Thanks,

Sean
_________________
Reality Blurs
Reality Blurs Tweets!
The Razorwise Report
The Blur is Now on G+
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Truckee Games
Seasoned


Joined: 14 May 2003
Posts: 461
Location: Truckee, CA - Sierra Nevada

PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 4:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good question!

If a .pdf is only ever meant to be used on screen, then landscape is best in my opinion because you can see the whole page: No scrolling up and down.

If a .pdf is going to be printed, then the standard portrait works best, for purely practical reasons (binding, et al).

I know from my own layout experience, however, this is twice the work for every product on your part, which may not be practical.

Whatever format you choose....I'm still buying. Wink
_________________
-Brent Wolke
Truckee Games
( www.truckeegames.blogspot.com )
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
SavagedRobby
Seasoned


Joined: 12 Jan 2005
Posts: 423
Location: Austin, TX

PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 4:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm for portrait for both. For one - assuming its going to be done portrait for printing purposes - it means less time to produce, and therefore will cost less (or the publisher will make a little more - either is good).

More selfishly, when I view a game related PDF, I have the search window and bookmark windows open while I read, usually on the sides. This works perfectly for portrait formatted PDFs. For landscape ones, I'd have to change that ... and I hate change. Wink
_________________
Considering the alternative, life is just fine.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jblittlefield
Legendary


Joined: 13 May 2003
Posts: 7472

PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 5:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I prefer both a high and low-res (read as print and printer-friendly) version in portrait. So long as I get these, I'm happy.

However, I would think that a printer-friendly version in landscape (for those using the product on their lap top during sessions). Of course, this requires extra time and effort (and in some cases money), so should only be done if the fans demand or is feasible.

I think it would also be a good thing to include an RTF version (with nothing but basic formatting) for those that like to cut-and-paste. This is easily generated from the final draft of the manuscript.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ben Jackson
Seasoned


Joined: 31 Aug 2005
Posts: 410
Location: In Boise! Horror!

PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 5:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Portrait! If someone is referencing and using the .pdf on their computer during play, they're more than likely going to at least have a search window open like SavagedRobby. Personally, I like everything in hardcopy, so portrait is also better for that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
palehorse
Heroic


Joined: 21 Jun 2003
Posts: 1962
Location: Oklahoma City, OK

PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 6:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SavageBrent wrote:
I know from my own layout experience, however, this is twice the work for every product on your part, which may not be practical.


Anyone who's similarly concerned about cost to the publisher, don't be. For the time being at least, I work cheap.

And, if anyone's interested, I prefer landscape for the screen-reading version. Obviously the printable version will be portrait; that's sort of a given, I'd think.
_________________
Butch Curry
Zombie Nirvana Games
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
jblittlefield
Legendary


Joined: 13 May 2003
Posts: 7472

PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 7:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

palehorse wrote:
And, if anyone's interested, I prefer landscape for the screen-reading version. Obviously the printable version will be portrait; that's sort of a given, I'd think.


I think the only time landscape is better than portrait for on-screen viewing is when the publisher is too lazy to make a "screen-friendly" portrait version (i.e., single column). Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
palehorse
Heroic


Joined: 21 Jun 2003
Posts: 1962
Location: Oklahoma City, OK

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 1:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jblittlefield wrote:
palehorse wrote:
And, if anyone's interested, I prefer landscape for the screen-reading version. Obviously the printable version will be portrait; that's sort of a given, I'd think.


I think the only time landscape is better than portrait for on-screen viewing is when the publisher is too lazy to make a "screen-friendly" portrait version (i.e., single column). Wink


With an 8.5 x 11 page, 2 columns are easier to read than 1, unless it's a fairly narrow column. Which is why RPG's are laid out the way they are in the first place.

If you're doing a digest-sized book (5.5 x 8.5) a single column is better.
_________________
Butch Curry
Zombie Nirvana Games
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
jblittlefield
Legendary


Joined: 13 May 2003
Posts: 7472

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 7:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

palehorse wrote:
jblittlefield wrote:
palehorse wrote:
And, if anyone's interested, I prefer landscape for the screen-reading version. Obviously the printable version will be portrait; that's sort of a given, I'd think.


I think the only time landscape is better than portrait for on-screen viewing is when the publisher is too lazy to make a "screen-friendly" portrait version (i.e., single column). Wink


With an 8.5 x 11 page, 2 columns are easier to read than 1, unless it's a fairly narrow column. Which is why RPG's are laid out the way they are in the first place.


Yes, but not on a computer screen -- unless you resize the page to fit the screen (or have a 19" or larger monitor), the page usually requires you to read a column and then scroll back up to the top of the next column.

For reading offline and printing, 2-column is the way to go; however, rather than making a landscape online version, it's easier to simply do a 1-column portrait version (easily created from your final draft in most cases).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bill
Legendary


Joined: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 3155
Location: Overland Park, Kansas

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 8:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would probably go for:

1) whatever is less expensive

2) portrate printer-friendly version

3) portrate printer versions

4) landscape computer viewable version as long as it doesn't add cost

5) win a big lottery so I can have everything I want printed in full color and bound with a 24" monitor to 'view' when I'm too lazy to pick up and search through the book Very Happy
_________________
The More I Learn, The Less I Know
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
palehorse
Heroic


Joined: 21 Jun 2003
Posts: 1962
Location: Oklahoma City, OK

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 11:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jblittlefield wrote:

Yes, but not on a computer screen -- unless you resize the page to fit the screen (or have a 19" or larger monitor), the page usually requires you to read a column and then scroll back up to the top of the next column.


That's the point of making a 2 column landscape: you can read it on-screen without having to scroll any given page.

Quote:
For reading offline and printing, 2-column is the way to go; however, rather than making a landscape online version, it's easier to simply do a 1-column portrait version (easily created from your final draft in most cases).


The question here isn't "Is it easier for someone to make a 2 column landscape?", because (for me at least, since layout and graphic design was what I went to college for, after all) it isn't particularly difficult. It's "Which would you prefer?"

For reading onscreen, I'd much prefer to read this:

http://www.sitesled.com/members/zombienirvana/SampleLandscape.PDF

than this, the single column you're recommending:

http://www.sitesled.com/members/zombienirvana/SamplePortrait.PDF

But other folks can look at them both and decide for themselves.
_________________
Butch Curry
Zombie Nirvana Games
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Maldroth
Seasoned


Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 188
Location: Bismarck, North Dakota

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 12:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

you know I guess it really depends on the material. Just by looking at your example I could see the benefit of two column landscape for say an Atlas or adventure situation where you could have a map on one column and the adjoining text on the other.
_________________
Lord Maldroth Mathison
The Planewalker
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Prest0
Seasoned


Joined: 31 Dec 2003
Posts: 389

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 3:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think a companion question to the above poll is: how many people read their PDFs on screen (and GM from their laptop) versus how many immediately print them out?
_________________
Preston P. DuBose
12 to Midnight

Thanks to all the East Texas University Kickstarter backers!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
jblittlefield
Legendary


Joined: 13 May 2003
Posts: 7472

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 3:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Prest0 wrote:
I think a companion question to the above poll is: how many people read their PDFs on screen (and GM from their laptop) versus how many immediately print them out?


OK. Wink

http://www.peginc.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8032
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bill
Legendary


Joined: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 3155
Location: Overland Park, Kansas

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 3:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Talk about responsive to readers! Wink
_________________
The More I Learn, The Less I Know
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sinisterthings
Novice


Joined: 23 Nov 2005
Posts: 28
Location: Campbell, CA

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 7:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Since I use both the printed and on-screen versions, depending on where I am and what I am doing (see other poll), having two layouts would make things more difficult. If I am used to seeing a table or paragraph in one place on the page (I scan by landmarks, not page numbers), and it moved when I switched to/from the printed copy, I might get lost and frustrated.
_________________
-- Patrick
www.sinisterthings.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Seeker of Truth
Heroic


Joined: 03 Nov 2005
Posts: 1064
Location: Des Plaines, IL

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 8:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I never thought about it until I saw the poll, but now that I think about it, in an ideal world, landscape for on screen and portrait for printing. I realize that it would be double the layout work, so I have no problem with only portrait.
_________________
Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. - The Delta Syndicate
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
palehorse
Heroic


Joined: 21 Jun 2003
Posts: 1962
Location: Oklahoma City, OK

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 8:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sinisterthings wrote:
Since I use both the printed and on-screen versions, depending on where I am and what I am doing (see other poll), having two layouts would make things more difficult. If I am used to seeing a table or paragraph in one place on the page (I scan by landmarks, not page numbers), and it moved when I switched to/from the printed copy, I might get lost and frustrated.


Bookmarks are one of the nice things about PDF's; they make that sort of thing a lot easier! It's really too bad more PDF publishers don't include them.
_________________
Butch Curry
Zombie Nirvana Games
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
palehorse
Heroic


Joined: 21 Jun 2003
Posts: 1962
Location: Oklahoma City, OK

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 8:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seeker of Truth wrote:
I never thought about it until I saw the poll, but now that I think about it, in an ideal world, landscape for on screen and portrait for printing. I realize that it would be double the layout work, so I have no problem with only portrait.


The extra work is not really that big a deal. For this sort of PDF release, it's going to be at most 40-50 pages. Like I said, that's no sweat for me, so don't let it influence your choice one way or another!
_________________
Butch Curry
Zombie Nirvana Games
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
sinisterthings
Novice


Joined: 23 Nov 2005
Posts: 28
Location: Campbell, CA

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 9:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

palehorse wrote:
Bookmarks are one of the nice things about PDF's; they make that sort of thing a lot easier! It's really too bad more PDF publishers don't include them.


You mean like GWG? Confused The lack of proper bookmarking and links in the SW PDF was the first comment and complaint by one of my players.
_________________
-- Patrick
www.sinisterthings.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Great White Games/Pinnacle Entertainment Group Forum Index -> SW General Chat & Game Stories All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum